Wp(C)/29874/2017 Of Hotel Ambassador v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/29874/2017 Of Hotel Ambassador v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/29874/2017 Of Hotel Ambassador v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
TUESDAY, THE 22 DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 29874 OF 2017
PETITIONER:
HOTEL AMBASSADORK.K.ROAD, KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,MR. JACOB KURIAN
BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 1, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING,SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM PIN-686001CIRCLE 1, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING,SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM PIN-686001
2PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAXOFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM PIN-686001BY ADVS.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXSRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON SR.
JOSE JOSEPH-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 22[nd] day of August, 2023
1.Heard Sri. Ramesh Cherian John, learnedcounsel for the petitioner as well as Sri.Jose Joseph,learned Standing Counsel appearing for therespondents.
2.The writ petition has been filed seeking following
reliefs:
i)Issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writor direction quashing Ext.P6.or direction quashing Ext.P6.
ii)Declare that the application for waiver of interestfiled as per Ext.P3 is deemed to be allowed in viewof the non-consideration of the waiver petitionwithin the time fixed by Finance Act, 2016.filed as per Ext.P3 is deemed to be allowed in viewof the non-consideration of the waiver petitionwithin the time fixed by Finance Act, 2016.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriatewrit or direction to the 1[st] respondent to keep inabeyance all further proceedings for collection ofinterest pursuant to Ext.P2 and P6.writ or direction to the 1[st] respondent to keep inabeyance all further proceedings for collection ofinterest pursuant to Ext.P2 and P6.
iv) Issue any other writ or direction this HonourableCourt deems fit considering the facts andcircumstances of the case.Court deems fit considering the facts andcircumstances of the case.
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner as well aslearned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department
WPC No.29874 of 2017
unanimously submitted that the issue involved is coveredby the judgment dated 06.07.2023 passed in W.P.(C.)No.29840/2017.
4.Considering the aforesaid submission, the writpetition is allowed. The impugned order, Ext.P6 is setaside. Concerned Income Tax authority is directed toconsider Ext.P3 application after hearing to the petitionerand pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Thepetitioner is directed to appear before the appropriateauthority/ the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Ernakulam, within a period of 15 days and makesubmissions in support of the application.
5.With the aforesaid directions, the writpetition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29874/2017
PETITIONER EXHIBITSEXHIBIT P1:
EXHIBIT P2:
EXHIBIT P2(A):
EXHIBIT P3:
EXHIBIT P4:
EXHIBIT P5:
EXHIBIT P6:
TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER OF THETRIBUNAL DT.11.11.2010
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.10.01.2011 GIVINGEFFECT TO EXT P1 ORDER
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.10.06.2013 PASSEDU/S 154 OF THE ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION/PETITION FOR WAIVER OF INEREST DT.05.07.2013 (WITHOUT ANNEXURES)
TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE DT.26.05.2017
TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DT.30.5.2017 SEEKING FOR A SHORT ADJOURNMENT
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.14.7.2017 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.