Wp(C)/30158/2018 Of K.k.mohandas v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30158/2018 Of K.k.mohandas v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/30158/2018 Of K.k.mohandas v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
WEDNESDAY,THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1940
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
PETITIONER:
K.K.MOHANDAS, AGED 62 YEARSKOLANTHARA HOUSE, MELMURINGODIPERAVOOR, KANNUR-670 673
BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR
RESPONDENTS:
1DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-II,
AYAKAR BHAVAN( NORTH BLOCK), KOZHIKODE, PIN- 673 001
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)COCHIN 682 036COCHIN 682 036
3TAX RECOVERY OFFICER(CENTRAL)KOCHI, 5TH FLOOR, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS, M.G ROAD, COCHIN 682 011
4ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 AAYAKARBHAVAN(NORTH BLOCK) CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 AAYAKARBHAVAN(NORTH BLOCK)
KOZHIKODE 673 001
SRI JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.11.2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an assessee, assailed Exts.P1 to P7 assessment ordersbefore the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the 2[nd] respondent. Thoseassessment orders belong to 2007-2008 to 2013-2014. Seeking their earlydisposal, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
2. Now the petitioner's counsel, however, confines the relief to theappellate authority's disposing of the interim stay petition.
3. Granted, the petitioner very recently filed a stay petition in an appealpending since 2015. The petitioner, nevertheless, wants to press the staypetition before the authority to ward off departmental coercive steps.
4. Though this Court is disinclined to fix a time frame on the 2[nd]respondent's considering the application, it however serves the interest ofjustice if the authority could consider the petitioner's stay petition,expeditiously.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
EXHIBIT P2
EXHIBIT P3
EXHIBIT P4
EXHIBIT P5
EXHIBIT P6
EXHIBIT P7
EXHIBIT P8
EXHIBIT P9
EXHIBIT P10
APPENDIX
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2007-08,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2008-09,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2008-09,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2009-10,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2009-10,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2010-11,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2010-11,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2011-12,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2011-12,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2012-13,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2013-14,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACTYEAR 2013-14,UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDERTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P2 ASSESSMENT ORDERTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P3 ASSESSMENT ORDERTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P3 ASSESSMENT ORDER
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
EXHIBIT P11
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P4 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P12
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P5 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P13TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P16 ASSESSMENTTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P16 ASSESSMENT
EXHIBIT P14TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P7 ASSESSMENTTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P7 ASSESSMENT
EXHIBIT P15TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 8-8-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2007-082018 FOR THE YEAR 2007-08
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P3 ASSESSMENT ORDERTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P3 ASSESSMENT ORDER
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
EXHIBIT P11
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P4 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P12
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P5 ASSESSMENT ORDER
EXHIBIT P13TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P16 ASSESSMENTTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P16 ASSESSMENT
EXHIBIT P14TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P7 ASSESSMENTTHE 2ND RESPONDENT AS AGAINST EXT P7 ASSESSMENT
EXHIBIT P15TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 8-8-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2007-082018 FOR THE YEAR 2007-08
EXHIBIT P16TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-8-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2008-092018 FOR THE YEAR 2008-09
EXHIBIT P17TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-08-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2009-1008-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2009-10
EXHIBIT P18TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-08-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2010-1108-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2010-11
EXHIBIT P19TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-08-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2011-1208-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12
EXHIBIT P20TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-08-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2012-1308-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13
WP(C).No. 30158 of 2018
EXHIBIT P21TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 9-08-2018 FOR THE YEAR 2013-14
EXHIBIT P22TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 15-08-2018 TO EXT P23 DEMAND NOTICE
EXHIBIT P23TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 28/08/2018 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
NIL
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE
SD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.