Wp(C)/30332/2021 Of The Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
14 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30332/2021 Of The Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
14 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/30332/2021 Of The Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 14 DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 24TH POUSHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 30332 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
THE THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED(PRESENTLY THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., DISTRICT OFFICE, THRISSUR), SAHAKARANA SATABDHI MANDIRAM, KOVILAKATHUMPADAM, THRISSUR-680022, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.
BY ADV SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, THRISSUR DISTRICT CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
RESPONDENTS:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC),DELHI-110002.NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC),DELHI-110002.
2THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
DELHI-110003.
ADV.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J=======================W.P.(C) No.30332 of 2021
-------------------------------Dated this the 14th day of January, 2022
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order, issued underSection 143(3) of the Income Tax, 1961, relating toassessment year 2018-2019, petitioner has preferredExt.P3 appeal before the 1[st] respondent. Petition forstay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment orderhas also been filed as Ext.P4 and the same ispending consideration. Since the stay petition ispending consideration before the 1[st] respondent, thiswrit petition can be disposed of with a direction.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the 1[st] respondent to consider and passorders on Ext.P4 stay petition, within a period oftwo months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment.
WP(C) NO.30332 OF 2021
3. Until such orders are passed, coercive proceedings
pursuant to Ext.P1assessment order shall be kept in
abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of.
AMV/14/01/2022
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30332/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITSNIL
TRUE COPY
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.