Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/30342/2013 Of T.abdul Majeed v. Th...

Wp(C)/30342/2013 Of T.abdul Majeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Dec 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30342/2013 Of T.abdul Majeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/30342/2013 Of T.abdul Majeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 30342 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER -------------------------- T.ABDUL MAJEED PROPRIETOR, FAIR PHARMA, BROADWAY KOCHI-682031. BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI SMT.S.HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2 (1) C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682018. CIRCLE-2 (1) C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682018. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C.R. BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-682018. KOCHI-682018. BY ADV. SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30342 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM V.CHITAMBARESH,J. = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C)No.30342 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 10[th] day of December, 2013 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 series petitions seekingwaiver of interest. The petitioner calls in aid Section 220(2A) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 for this purpose. The respondentspoint out that the tax liability has to be cleared by the petitionerbefore seeking waiver. The petitioner however asserts that thereis no outstanding liability towards the component of tax. 2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 seriespetitions with notice to the petitioner within a period of threemonths. This is subject to the condition that the petitioner clearsthe tax liability (excluding interest) within a period of one month. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petitionwith the judgment before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESHJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan