Wp(C)/30350/2013 Of T.aabdul Mnajeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Dec 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30350/2013 Of T.aabdul Mnajeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/30350/2013 Of T.aabdul Mnajeed v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
PETITIONER
--------------------------
WP(C).No. 30350 of 2013 (P)
----------------------------
T.ABDUL MAJEED PROPRIETOR, FAIR PHARMA BROADWAY, KOCHI 682 031
BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI SMT.S.HEMALATHA
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1) C.R BUILDINGS, I.S PRESS ROAD ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 018 CIRCLE-2(1) C.R BUILDINGS, I.S PRESS ROAD ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 018
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-II KERALA BHAVAN,KOCHI 682 016 KERALA BHAVAN,KOCHI 682 016
R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 30350 of 2013 (P)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 01-03-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1994-95RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1994-95
EXHIBIT P19A) ASSEEMENT ORDER DATED 01-03-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1995-1996RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1995-1996
EXHIBIT P1(B) ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 01-03-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1996-1997RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1996-1997
EXHIBIT P1(C) ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 01-03-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1997-98RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1997-98
EXHIBIT P1(D) ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 01-03-2010 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1998-99RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 1998-99
EXHIBIT P2 APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON ON 31-10-2010 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 94-952ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 94-95
EXHIBIT P2(A) APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 31-03-2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 95-96RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 95-96
EXHIBIT P2(B) APPELA FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 31-03-2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 96-97RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 96-97
EXHIBIT P2(C) APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIOENR ON 31-03-2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 97-98RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 97-98
EXHIBIT P2(D) APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIOENR ON 31-03-2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 98-99RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 98-99
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A TO JUDGE
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C)No. 30350 of 2013
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 10[th] day of December, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 series appeals againstExt.P1 series order of assessment. The petitioner has a case thathe has discharged the entire tax liability however excludinginterest.
2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P2 seriesappeals with notice to the petitioner within a period of sixmonths. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petitionwith the judgment before the second respondent for compliance.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V.CHITAMBARESH
JUDGE
smm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.