Wp(C)/30409/2019 Of Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30409/2019 Of Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/30409/2019 Of Naruvamoodu Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1941
WP(C).No.30409 OF 2019(A)
PETITIONER:
NARUVAMOODU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.160,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NARUVAMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN- 695020.
BY ADVS.SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVANSRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(2), OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695003.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN- 695003.3THE REGISTRAR,INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, BLOCK NO.C1 AND C2, 1ST FLOOR, KAKKANAD, COCHIN- 682030.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P3 rectified order under the Income Tax Act, thepetitioner has preferred Ext.P4 appeal and Ext.P5 stay petition beforethe 3[rd] respondent. It is stated that the issue involved pertains to thedis-allowance of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as alsothe learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
3.Taking note of the fact that this Court has, in similarmatters, granted a stay against recovery of amounts pendingconsideration of the appeal by the Appellate Authority, I dispose thewrit petition with a direction to the 3[rd] respondent to consider and passorders on Ext.P4 appeal, within an outer time limit of six months fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing thepetitioner. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed againstthe petitioner by Ext.P3 rectified order shall be kept in abeyance tillsuch time as orders are passed by the 3[rd] respondent, as directed andthe order communicated to the petitioner.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THEYEAR 2012-2013 DATED 14.12.2017.
EXHIBIT P2A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.12.2018 IN ITA NO.184/EF/TVM/CIT(A)/TVM/2017-18 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.09.2019 IN ITA NO.184/EF/TVM/CIT(A)/TVM/2017-18, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 154 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT.
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 16.10.2019 ALONG WITH AFFIDAVIT AND CHELAN.
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P4 APPEAL DATED 16.10.2019.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.