Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/30473/2018 Of P.l.tony v. Deputy C...

Wp(C)/30473/2018 Of P.l.tony v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/30473/2018 Of P.l.tony v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/30473/2018 Of P.l.tony v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY ,THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1940WP(C).No. 30473 of 2018 PETITIONER/S: P.L.TONY,AGED 58 YEARSPANTHALLOOKARAN HOUSE, KODAKARA PO, THRISSUR 680684 BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.ACHYUT K PADMARAJSREEJITH R.NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR.-680001CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR.-680001 2THE PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL),KOCHI.682018(CENTRAL),KOCHI.682018 BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). No. 30473 of 2018 JUDGMENT The petitioner's counsel submits that the Department fileda review petition in a connected writ petition. Because of thatdevelopment, this writ petition becomes infructuous. He wantsthe leave of the Court to withdraw it. Leave granted and the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE das APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF MAHAZAR.EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 15.02.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 27.01.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19.02.2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. W.P.(C). No. 30473 of 2018 EXHIBIT P5 EXHIBIT P6 EXHIBIT P7 EXHIBIT P8 EXHIBIT P9 EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 16.02.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF REMINDER DATED 03.04.2018SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 05.07.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.7/2003 DATED 05.09.2003. TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 01.08.2018IN WRIT PETITION NO.23790 OF 2018. TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 14.08.2018 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan