Wp(C)/31037/2019 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
16 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/31037/2019 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/31037/2019 Of Kanhirode Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: In the light of Ext.P5 judgment, all recoveryproceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appealbefore the third respondent shall be kept in abeyance tillthe appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
SATURDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 25TH KARTHIKA, 1941WP(C).No.31037 OF 2019(D)
PETITIONER/S:
KANHIRODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,KANHIRODE P.O., KANNUR - 670592, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PRADEEPAN K.
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KANNUR RANGE, KANNUR-670006.670006.2THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001.3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673001.
BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABERAHAM, SC, FOR IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON16.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of November 2019
The petitioner is a Primary Agricultural CreditSociety. Aggrieved by Ext.P4 order of the secondrespondent, they approached this Court. By the said order,the petitioner was directed to pay 20% of the disputedamount demanded by the second respondent. A similar issuewas considered by this Court in W.P.(C) No.28170/2019 dated23.10.2019, produced as Ext.P5.
In the light of Ext.P5 judgment, all recoveryproceedings pursuant to the impugned order in the appealbefore the third respondent shall be kept in abeyance tillthe appeal is disposed of.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
ln
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
WP(C).No.31037/2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.12.2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2013-14.31.12.2015 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE AY 2013-14.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THEAY 2013-14.THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THEAY 2013-14.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2019 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE DISPOSING THE STAY PETITIONS FOR THE AY 2013-14 AND 2016-17.BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE DISPOSING THE STAY PETITIONS FOR THE AY 2013-14 AND 2016-17.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.10.2019 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.28170OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.28170OF 2019 IN SIMILAR CASE.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.