Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Op...

Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 01 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
01 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY,THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 12TH MAGHA, 1940WP(C).No. 3139 of 2019 PETITIONER: PONNANI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.4841PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673 001 2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD (4),TIRUR-676 001 OTHER PRESENT: SC SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act, questioned the Ext.P1 assessment order, beforethe firstrespondent. The petitioner has also filed a stay petition inthe appeal. Ventilating its grievance that the authorities are takingcoercive steps before the appellate authority could considers the stay WPC No.3139 OF 2019 2 petition in the appeal, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory remedy of filing an appeal. It appears that it has also filed a stay petition. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities maywait, before taking further steps, until the appellate authoritydecides on the stay petition. Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent authority to defer coercive steps until the firstrespondent considers the stay petition. I also hope that the firstrespondent will dispose of the stay petition expeditiously. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan