Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
01 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
01 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3139/2019 Of Ponnani Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY,THE 01ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 12TH MAGHA, 1940WP(C).No. 3139 of 2019
PETITIONER:
PONNANI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.4841PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENTS:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673 001
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD (4),TIRUR-676 001
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-
operative Societies Act, questioned the Ext.P1 assessment order, beforethe firstrespondent. The petitioner has also filed a stay petition inthe appeal. Ventilating its grievance that the authorities are takingcoercive steps before the appellate authority could considers the stay
WPC No.3139 OF 2019 2
petition in the appeal, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader.
3. I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory
remedy of filing an appeal. It appears that it has also filed a stay
petition. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities maywait, before taking further steps, until the appellate authoritydecides on the stay petition.
Therefore, I dispose of the writ petition directing the
respondent authority to defer coercive steps until the firstrespondent considers the stay petition. I also hope that the firstrespondent will dispose of the stay petition expeditiously.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.