Wp(C)/31399/2019 Of Moideen.v v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
28 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/31399/2019 Of Moideen.v v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
28 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/31399/2019 Of Moideen.v v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941WP(C).No.31399 OF 2019(Y)
PETITIONER:
MOIDEEN.VAGED 50 YEARSS/O.KUNHAMED, VALLIKKADAN HOUSE, PARABILANGADI, EDARIKKODE, MALAPPURAM-676501.
BY ADV. SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICEROFFICE OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD-3, TARIFF BAZAR, TOWN HALL ROAD, TIRUR-676101.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),KOZHIKODE.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON28.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
JUDGMENT
Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act, petitionerhas preferred Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P4 stay petition before the 2[nd]respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering thestay petition, recovery steps are taken by the respondents against thepetitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by Ext.P1 assessment order.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andalso the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as alsothe submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with thefollowing directions:
1. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass reasoned orderson Ext.P3 stay petition within a period of one month from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing thepetitioner.
2. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed againstthe petitioner by Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept inabeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 2[nd]respondent as directed above and communicated to thepetitioner.
3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition
3
together with a copy of this judgment, before the 2[nd]respondent, for further action.
SJ
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIARJUDGE
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.12.2018 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 24.01.2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPTOF EXT.P2 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.