Wp(C)/3149/2021 Of Pooppally Coir Mills v. Agricultureal Income Tax And State Tax Officer
High Court
08 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3149/2021 Of Pooppally Coir Mills v. Agricultureal Income Tax And State Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3149/2021 Of Pooppally Coir Mills v. Agricultureal Income Tax And State Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 19TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.3149 OF 2021(P)
PETITIONER:
POOPPALLY COIR MILLSAS ROAD,ALAPPUZHA-688007,(REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGINGPARTNER,DILIP CHERIAN THOMAS).
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.SREEJITH R.NAIRSMT.TELMA RAJUSRI.SANGEETH JOSEPH JACOB
RESPONDENTS:
1AGRICULTUREAL INCOME TAX AND STATE TAX OFFICERKERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAXES DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAXES DEPARTMENT,
2STATE OF KERALA,STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
GP-- THUSHARA JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 8th day of February 2021
Heard both sides.
2.The limited grievance of the petitioner is to the effect thatdespite passing orders at Exts. P1 to P3, the respondents have notpassed the final order in Form GST PMT-03 regarding re-credit of theamount to the electronic credit ledger.
Considering the limited prayer made in the petition, the petitionis disposed of with a direction to the respondents to passconsequential order in form GST PMT-03, if not passed earlier, within aperiod of one month from the communication of this judgment to therespondents. The learned Government Pleader to communicate thisorder to the respondents.
Nsd//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
SD/-
A.M.BADAR
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.9.2020 FOR THE MONTH OF JULY,2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.9.2020 FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST,2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.9.2020 FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER,2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.11.2020 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.11.2020 MARKED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.