Wp(C)/31577/2006 Of Mr.t.t.k.vaidyan,Trivandrum v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-I
High Court
12 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/31577/2006 Of Mr.t.t.k.vaidyan,Trivandrum v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-I
Date of order
12 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/31577/2006 Of Mr.t.t.k.vaidyan,Trivandrum v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-I, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/22ND PHALGUNA 1933
WP(C).No. 31577 of 2006 (H)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------
MR. T.T.K. VAIDYAN,
(THENGUMVILAYIL KOCHUKOSHY VAIDYAN), BELLA VISTA, OPPOSITE RAJ BHAVAN, KOWDIAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
BY ADV. SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):--------------------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD - I(3), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV.SRI.JOSE JOSEPH,SC
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.31577 OF 2006(H)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of March, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Leaned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writpetition has become infructuous. Submission is recorded. Writpetition is dismissed as infructuous.
vi/
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.