Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/3185/2015 Of M/S.orissa Computer A...

Wp(C)/3185/2015 Of M/S.orissa Computer Academy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Jun 2015 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

18 Jun 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3185/2015 Of M/S.orissa Computer Academy v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

WPC No.3185 of 2015 02.11.2015 Heard Mr.A.C.Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.K.Acharya, learned Sr.Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. This writ application has come to be filed seeking stay of demand levied during pendency of the statutory appeal. Admittedly, the First Appeal has been filed and the order of attachment was vacated by this Court vide order dated 27.4.2015 on account of the fact that the amount has already been collected by the Revenue pending disposal of the First Appeal. Therefore, the present writ application stands disposed of in terms of our interim order and the Department shall take expeditious steps to dispose of the First Appeal. No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner enforcing the demand pending disposal of the First Appeal. Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the Income Tax Department. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. .. I.Mahanty, J . ...... Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J. Ranjan

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.