Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/31883/2011 Of Mavilayi Service Co-...

Wp(C)/31883/2011 Of Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Kannur

High Court 07 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/31883/2011 Of Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Kannur
Date of order
07 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008, 2008-2009
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/31883/2011 Of Mavilayi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Kannur, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ petition is disposed of as above. ln Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013/17TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 31883 of 2011 (I) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- MAVILAYI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.C 4683, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MAVILAYI.P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.670 622. BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-I, OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KANNUR RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN KANNUR DISTRICT-670 006. KANNUR RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN KANNUR DISTRICT-670 006. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CIB), I.S.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 018. I.S.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 018. 3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX R3 & R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI MANOJ KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-1-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 31883 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1:COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 13.10.2011 P2:COPY OF THE NOTICE F.nO.27/142(1)(II)/2011-12 DATED 29.07.2011 P3:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO. 2536 OF 2009 DATED 24.11.2009 P4:COPY OF THE ORDER IN SLP NO.3976 OF 2010 OF THE SUPREME COURT P5:COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 24.08.2011 P6:COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 1.9.2011 P7:COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE RETURN SUBMITTED FOR THE ASSESMENT YEAR 2009-2010.ASSESMENT YEAR 2009-2010. P8:COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION F NO.AAAAM8091L/144/2011-12 DATED 3.10.2011.3.10.2011. P9:COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT REQUIRING THE PETITIONER TO FILE ITS RETURN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-2008 DATED 12.09.2011.PETITIONER TO FILE ITS RETURN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-2008 DATED 12.09.2011. P10:COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT REQUIRING THE PETITIONER TO FILE ITS RETURN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 DATED 12.09.2011PETITIONER TO FILE ITS RETURN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 DATED 12.09.2011 P11:COPY OF NOTICE F NO.ITO(CIB)/CIT/2008-09 DATED 2.2.2009 OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.)8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE.ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.)8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE. P12:COPY OF COMMUNICATION F NO.ITO(CIB)CIT/2008-09/1116 DATED 16.03.2009 OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE.16.03.2009 OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR IF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE. P13:COPY OF COMMUNICATION F.NO.ITO(CIB)/CIT/2009-2010/292 DATED 10.8.2009 OF THE ASSISSTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE.10.8.2009 OF THE ASSISSTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN NORTH BLOCK, KOZHIKODE. P14:COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE F. NO.JT. CIT (CIB)CHN/SC/2009-2010 DATED 13.11.2009 OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CIB), COCHIN.DATED 13.11.2009 OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CIB), COCHIN. P15:COPY OF THE NOTICE F NO.ITO (CIB)/CLT/2009-10 DATED 5.2.2010 OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK KOZHIKODE.THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK KOZHIKODE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: R1(A):COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S142(1) DATED 28.02.2011. /TRUE COPY/ SKV P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC,J -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.31883 of 2011 ------------------------------------- P14:COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE F. NO.JT. CIT (CIB)CHN/SC/2009-2010 DATED 13.11.2009 OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CIB), COCHIN.DATED 13.11.2009 OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CIB), COCHIN. P15:COPY OF THE NOTICE F NO.ITO (CIB)/CLT/2009-10 DATED 5.2.2010 OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK KOZHIKODE.THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV.) 8TH FLOOR, AYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK KOZHIKODE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: R1(A):COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S142(1) DATED 28.02.2011. /TRUE COPY/ SKV P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC,J -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.31883 of 2011 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 7[th]day of January, 2013 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Co-operative Society. They approached this Court challenging Exts.P2, P6 and P8. Ext.P2 is anotice under Section 142 of the Income Tax Act. For itsnon-compliance, Ext.P6 penalty notice was issued and byExt.P8, the petitioner was informed that its return cannotbe accepted. It is in the aforesaid circumstances, the writpetition is filed. 2. This Court passed interim order dated 06.12.2011, admitting the writ petition and directing the petitioner tofurnish details regarding the income as sought for inExt.P2 without disclosing the names and addresses ofcustomers of the petitioner. It was also ordered thatbased on the information so furnished, the AssessingOfficer may complete the assessment. Petitioner saysthat information was furnished and rejecting the same, W.P.(C).No.31883 of 2011 assessment was completed. It is also stated that they have already filed an appeal before the statutoryauthorities to challenging the assessment orders. Nowthat the appellate authority is seized of the appeal filed bythe petitioner, it is unnecessary for this Court to go intothe merits of the contentions raised. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directingthat the appellate authority will pass orders on the appealand that the contentions raised in this writ petition areleft open. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ln Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan