Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/32130/2009 Of South India Produce...

Wp(C)/32130/2009 Of South India Produce Co v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Nov 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/32130/2009 Of South India Produce Co v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/32130/2009 Of South India Produce Co v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32130 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SOUTH INDIA PRODUCE CO., P.B.NO.344, JEW TOWN, KOCHI-682 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER - T.VIDYASAGAR. BY ADVS. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE I, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE I(1), KOCHI. 4. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RANGE I, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-18. BY ADV. SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P.(C)No. 32130 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20[th] day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T 1.Since Ext.P7 application filed by the petitioner before the 1[st] respondent seeking waiver of interest underSection 220 (2), 234 B & 234 C of the Income Tax Act,1961,is pending consideration and disposal, I am of the opinionthat the writ petition can be disposed of on issuingnecessary directions to that authority. 2.Standing counsel appearing for the respondentson instructions submitted that the 1[st] respondent hadalready called for reports and connected records from theassessing authority concerned and the petition will bedisposed of as and when the same is received. 3.Under the above circumstances the 1[st] respondent is directed to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7application, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, as early as possible at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of thisjudgment. 4.Till the 1[st] respondent disposes Ext.P7 applicationas directed above, all further steps for realisation of theamount of interest in dispute, shall be kept in abeyance. C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE shg/
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan