Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/32281/2007 Of K.e.abdul Rahiman v....

Wp(C)/32281/2007 Of K.e.abdul Rahiman v. Agrl. Income Tax & Commercial Tax Office

High Court 31 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

31 Oct 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/32281/2007 Of K.e.abdul Rahiman v. Agrl. Income Tax & Commercial Tax Office, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2007 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 32281 of 2007(R) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- K.E.ABDUL RAHIMAN, BEAUTY SILK HOUSE, PAZHAVANGADI P.O., RANNY. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR ADV. SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RANNY-689 672.. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, THEVALLY, KOLLAM. PIN 691 009. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (H.QUARTERS), RANNY-689 672. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.P. PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = =W.P.(C) No. 32281 OF 2007 R= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 31[st] October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Ext. P1 is the order of assessment in respect ofwhich Ext. P2 appeal has been filed by the petitioner.However, the appeal was filed belatedly and hence Ext.P4 application for condonation of delay has been made.It is also submitted that although Ext. P3 applicationfor stay is pending, revenue recovery proceedings havebeen initiated against the petitioner as per Exts. P5and P6. It is in this background this writ petitionhas been filed. 2. Taking into account the submissions that aremade, I dispose of this writ petition directing thatExt.P4 delay condonation application shall beconsidered by the 2[nd] respondent. Orders on the delaycondonation application shall be passed asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate within a periodof 3 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3.Thereafter, depending upon the outcome of Ext.P4, Ext. P2 appeal shall also be dealt with. In the meantime, revenue recovery proceedings pursuant toExts. P5 and P6 shall be deferred on condition that thepetitioner remits Rs.75,000/- within three weeks fromtoday. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.