Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/32368/2006 Of K.g.bindhu v. Agrl....

Wp(C)/32368/2006 Of K.g.bindhu v. Agrl. Income Tax And Other

High Court 06 Dec 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/32368/2006 Of K.g.bindhu v. Agrl. Income Tax And Other
Date of order
06 Dec 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/32368/2006 Of K.g.bindhu v. Agrl. Income Tax And Other, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2006 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32368 of 2006(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.G.BINDU, HI-TECH INDUSTRIES, THODUVATTY, P.O.PUTHENKUNNU, S.BATHERY, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, S.BATHERY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE. 3. TAHSILDAR (RR), AMBALAWAYAL. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 32368 Of 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6[th] day of December, 2006. JUDGMENT Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedGovernment Pleader and having perused Ext.P1, as also the groundsof Ext.P2, it is directed that enforcement of Ext.P1 assessment willstand suspended during the pendency of Ext.P2 on condition thatpetitioner pays an amount of Rs.25,000/- within a period of threeweeks. It is further directed that, on such deposit being made, theappeal shall be considered for disposal, within a period of 4 monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan