Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/32723/2019 Of Andoorkonam Service...

Wp(C)/32723/2019 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 03 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/32723/2019 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/32723/2019 Of Andoorkonam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941WP(C).No.32723 OF 2019(M) PETITIONER/S: ANDOORKONAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3127REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, KEEZHAVOOR.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695584. BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.HARIKUMARSRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1),OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KAWDIAR.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695003.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KAWDIAR.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695003. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003.AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003. 3THE REGISTRAR,INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, KENDRIYA BHAVAN,BLOCK NO.C1 AND C2,1ST FLOOR, KAKKANAD,COCHIN,PIN-682030. 4THE NEDUMANGAD CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.NO.3193,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,VEMBAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-695615. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Against Ext.P3 rectified order under the Income Tax Act, the petitionerpreferred Ext.P4 appeal and Ext.P5 stay petition before the 3[rd] respondent. It isthe case of the petitioner that while the stay petition was pending consideration,the respondents initiated garnishee proceedings and recovered the entire amountsdue from the petitioner. Taking note of the said submission, I find that there is noscope for further recovery proceedings to be initiated by the respondents. I,therefore, direct the 3[rd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 appealpreferred by the petitioner within an outer time limit of three months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Thepetitioner shall produce copy of this judgment together with a copy of the writpetition before the 3[rd] respondent for further action. Sd/- sd A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIARJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: sd
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan