Wp(C)/32725/2022 Of Muhammed Sherif v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
14 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/32725/2022 Of Muhammed Sherif v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
14 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/32725/2022 Of Muhammed Sherif v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 14 DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 22ND ASWINA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 32725 OF 2022
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 14[th] day of October, 2022
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment,petitioner filed Ext.P3 appeal along with Ext.P4application for stay. The appeal and stay petition arepending consideration of the 1[st] respondent. Thepetitioner apprehends that recovery proceedings maybe initiated to recover amounts due under Ext.P1order pending consideration of stay petition by the 1[st]respondent/Appellate Authority.
2.Heard the learned Standing Counsel also.Having regard to the facts and circumstances ofthe case and considering the submissions, I aminclined to disposed of the writ petition directing the1[st] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4application for stay filed in Ext.P3 appeal within aperiod of two months from the date of receipt of acertified copy of the judgment. Till such time as
orders are passed on Ext.P4 application, proceedingsfor recovery of amounts due from the petitioner shallbe kept in abeyance.
SKP/14-10
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32725/2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.