Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/3288/2020 Of Shri. Karuvalli Ali T...

Wp(C)/3288/2020 Of Shri. Karuvalli Ali Thajudheen v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 06 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3288/2020 Of Shri. Karuvalli Ali Thajudheen v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3288/2020 Of Shri. Karuvalli Ali Thajudheen v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: With these observations and directions, the above Writ Petition(Civil) stands finally disposed of. sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE. acd W.P.(C)No.3288/2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: True CopyP.S to Judge

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 17TH MAGHA, 1947 WP(C).No.3288 OF 2020(I) PETITIONER: SHRI. KARUVALLI ALI THAJUDHEENKARUVALLI, PERUMANI, VENGOLA P.O., ERNAKULAM-683556. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SENIOR.)SMT.NISHA JOHNSRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: OTHER PRESENT: SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON06.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.3288 of 2020 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6[th] day of February, 2020 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2appeal along with Ext.P-3 stay petition. The petitioner's grievance is thatduring the pendency of the stay petition, coercive recovery proceedingshave been initiated by the assessing authority for recovery of the disputedamounts. 2.Heard Smt.Nisha John, learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner and Sri. Christopher Abraham, learned Standing Counselappearing for the respondents. Heard Smt.Nisha John, learned counsel appearing for the 3.After hearing both sides and after taking note of the facts andcircumstances of the case, it is ordered in the interest of justice that the 2[nd]respondent shall take up the matters in Ext.P-3 stay application filed inExt.P-2 appeal and after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard tothe petitioner through his authorised representative/ counsel, if any, shallpass orders on the stay application without much delay, preferably withina period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of W.P.(C)No.3288/2020 this judgment. Until orders are thus passed on the abovesaid stayapplication, further coercive steps for enforcement of the impugned orderwill be kept in abeyance. With these observations and directions, the above Writ Petition(Civil) stands finally disposed of. sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE. acd W.P.(C)No.3288/2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: True CopyP.S to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan