Wp(C)/33257/2018 Of Manu Traders v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer
High Court
11 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/33257/2018 Of Manu Traders v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/33257/2018 Of Manu Traders v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 19TH ASWINA,1940
WP(C).No. 33257 of 2018
PETITIONER/S:
MANU TRADERSPULIMOTTIL HOUSE, MANNANCHERRY, PIN 688538. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,(REPRESENTED BY SMT. RAJALAKSHMI P. PROPRIETOR)
BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARANSRI.N.SANTHOSHKUMARSRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR (A-1768)
RESPONDENT/S:
1AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICERSTATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA 688001
2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),STATE GOODS SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
3DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(PR),AMBALAPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP. DR. THUSHARA JAMES
W.P.(C). No. 33257 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax
Act, on the rolls of the 1[st] respondent, has been facing the assessmentproceedings. It filed the Exts.P5 to P7 statutory appeals along withstay petitions, besides delay condonation petitions. The delay is saidto be one year and eight months. The petitioner complains thatbefore the appellate forum could consider his interlocutoryapplications, the respondent authority is taking coercive steps.
2.This Court, after hearing the learned counsel on eitherside, disposes of this writ petition holding that the 2[nd] respondentmay consider the interlocutory applications, including the delaycondonation petition, at the earliest and pass orders, possibly, withinone month.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
W.P.(C). No. 33257 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32041355714/2010-11 DATED 30.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.NO.32041355714/2010-11 DATED 30.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32041355714/2012-13 DATED 25/01/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.NO.32041355714/2012-13 DATED 25/01/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32041355714/2013-14 DATED 25.09/2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.NO.32041355714/2013-14 DATED 25.09/2016 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32041355714/2014-15 DATED 31/05/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2010-11 AGAINST EXT.P1 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P5 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P5 BTRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT-05 APPEAL BEFORE ETHE 2NDRESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.
EXHIBIT P6
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2012-13 AGAINST EXT.P2 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
W.P.(C). No. 33257 of 2018
-4-
EXHIBIT P6 ATRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.FILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P6 BTRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2013-14 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE TEH 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.THE YEAR 2013-14 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE TEH 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P7 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P7 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMOERANDUM FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P8 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P8 B
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2013-14 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE TEH 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.THE YEAR 2013-14 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE TEH 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P7 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P7 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMOERANDUM FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 AGAINST EXT.P3 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P8 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27/07/2018.
EXHIBIT P8 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 05/10/2018.
EXHIBIT P9
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM 1 FORM 1 BEARING RRC NO.2018/2674/04 DATED 10/05/2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
W.P.(C). No. 33257 of 2018
EXHIBIT P10
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM 1 NO.2018/2684/04 DATED 10/05/2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.