Wp(C)/33271/2018 Of Nitro Digital Controls v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer
High Court
11 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/33271/2018 Of Nitro Digital Controls v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/33271/2018 Of Nitro Digital Controls v. Agricultural Income Tax And Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
THURSDAY ,THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 19TH ASWINA,1940
WP(C).No. 33271 of 2018
PETITIONER/S:
NITRO DIGITAL CONTROLSPULIMOTTIL HOUSE, MANNANCHERRY, PIN - 688 534,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT (REPRESENTED BY SRI.V.GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, MANAGING PARTNER)
BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARANSRI.N.SANTHOSHKUMARSRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR (A-1768)
RESPONDENT/S:
1AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICERSTATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.
2DEPUTY COMMISSIONERAPPEALS, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA 6880013DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR)AMBALAPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA 688001
OTHER PRESENT:
GP. DR. THUSHARA JAMES
W.P.(C). No. 33271 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an assessee under the Kerala Value Added TaxAct, on the rolls of the 1[st] respondent, has been facing the assessment
proceedings. It filed the Exts.P4 to P6 statutory appeals along withstay petitions, besides delay condonation petitions. The delay is saidto be one year and three months. The petitioner complains thatbefore the appellate forum could consider his interlocutoryapplications, the respondent authority is taking coercive steps.
2.This Court, after hearing the learned counsel on eitherside, disposes of this writ petition holding that the 2[nd] respondentmay consider the interlocutory applications, including the delaycondonation petitions, at the earliest and pass orders, possibly,within one month.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE
W.P.(C). No. 33271 of 2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. 32041356873/2011-12 DATED 2.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT32041356873/2011-12 DATED 2.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. 32041356873/2012-13 DATED 25.3.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT32041356873/2012-13 DATED 25.3.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. 32041356873/2014-15 DATED 2.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT32041356873/2014-15 DATED 2.6.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2011-12 AGAINST EXT.P1 FILED BEFORE TE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018THE YEAR 2011-12 AGAINST EXT.P1 FILED BEFORE TE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
EXHIBIT P4 A
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT. P4 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018FILED IN EXT. P4 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
EXHIBIT P4 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT. P4 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT 5.10.2018FILED IN EXT. P4 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT 5.10.2018
EXHIBIT P5
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2012-13, AGAINST EXT.P2 FILEDBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018THE YEAR 2012-13, AGAINST EXT.P2 FILEDBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
EXHIBIT P5 ATRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
EXHIBIT P5 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018
W.P.(C). No. 33271 of 2018
EXHIBIT P6
EXHIBIT P6 A
EXHIBIT P6 B
EXHIBIT P7
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2014-15 AGAINST EXT.P6 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM I FORM I BEARING RRC NO. 2018/2198/04 DATED 17.3.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5 B
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018
W.P.(C). No. 33271 of 2018
EXHIBIT P6
EXHIBIT P6 A
EXHIBIT P6 B
EXHIBIT P7
EXHIBIT P8
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FORTHE YEAR 2014-15 AGAINST EXT.P6 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 27.7.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR DELAYFILED IN EXT.P6 APPEAL BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 5.10.2018
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM I FORM I BEARING RRC NO. 2018/2198/04 DATED 17.3.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE IN MALAYALAM ALONG WITH TRUE TRANSLATION IN ENGLISH IN FORM 1 NO. 2018/2670/04 DATED 10.5.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.