Wp(C)/3341/2022 Of Chalissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3341/2022 Of Chalissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2015-16, 2018-19
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3341/2022 Of Chalissery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 1 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 12TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 3341 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
M/S.CHALISSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDP-579, CHALISSERY, PALAKKAD - 679 536 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI.PUSHPAKARAN, VALIYAVEETUVALAPPIL KANDU.BY ADVS.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)NISHA JOHNALAN PRIYADARSHI DEVV.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENTS:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOMNO 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003.2THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-2, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, THAYILPATTI, PUDUPPALLI THERUVU, VALAKKAD, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV.JOSE JOSEPH-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON01.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 3341 of 2022
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 1[st] day of February, 2022
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is challenging orders of penalty issued
under Section 271(1)(c) and 270A of the Income Tax Act asper Ext.P1 to Ext.P3. Since, the aforesaid orders of penaltyare appealable under Section 246A of the Act, I am of theview that the remedy of the petitioner is to pursue thestatutory remedies. Accordingly, this writ petition isdismissed, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to pursuethe statutory remedies against Ext.P1 to Ext.P3.
This writ petition is dismissed.
AJM
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3341/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS :
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 29/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 28/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.29/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 28/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 15/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 15/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.15/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 15/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER DATED 15/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 14/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.15/12/2021 AND DEMAND NOTICE DATED 14/12/2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15.HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15.
Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16.HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16.
Exhibit P6
TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19.HAVING E-FILED APPEALS BEFORE THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19.
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.