Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/3347/2009 Of Sreekrishna Saw Mill...

Wp(C)/3347/2009 Of Sreekrishna Saw Mill v. Agricultural Income Tax

High Court 30 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3347/2009 Of Sreekrishna Saw Mill v. Agricultural Income Tax
Date of order
30 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3347/2009 Of Sreekrishna Saw Mill v. Agricultural Income Tax, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of directingthe second respondent to consider and take a decision onExts.P17 to P20 applications for stay in accordance with lawwithin one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisJudgment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3347 of 2009(W) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- M/S.SREEKRISHNA SAW MILL, ANJUMOORTHYMANGALAM.P.O, ALATHUR,REP; BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.KUTTAN. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SMT.K.HYMAVATHY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ALATHUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 3347 OF 2009 W -------------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] January, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedGovernment Pleader. The Writ Petition is disposed of directingthe second respondent to consider and take a decision onExts.P17 to P20 applications for stay in accordance with lawwithin one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisJudgment. There will be a further direction that if the petitionerfiles applications for stay in respect of Exts.P13 to P16 withinone week from today, a decision will be taken by the secondrespondent within a period of three weeks from the date of filingthe applications for stay. Till such time as a decision is taken,recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P25 to P32 will be keptin abeyance. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan