Wp(C)/33597/2017 Of M/S. Arafa Gold v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Oct 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/33597/2017 Of M/S. Arafa Gold v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/33597/2017 Of M/S. Arafa Gold v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of without anyobservation on merits.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/1ST KARTHIKA, 1939
PETITIONER :
------------------
WP(C).No. 33597 of 2017 (Y)
----------------------------
M/S. ARAFA GOLD, NEAR JUMA MAZJID, TC-39/117,CHALAI, TRIVANDRUM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNEER K ABDUL SALAM
BY ADVS.SRI.K.J.ABRAHAM SRI.NIKHIL JOHN
RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM 691 001
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM 691 001
3.
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM 682 036
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC,
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 33597 of 2017 (Y)
---------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) DATED NIL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12DATED NIL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S. 143(3) DATED NIL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13DATED NIL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S. 271B DATED 28-11-2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12DATED 28-11-2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN FORM 35 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 DATED 30-04-2014FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 DATED 30-04-2014
EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN FORM 35 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 DATED 30-04-2015FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 DATED 30-04-2015
EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN FORM 35 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 DATED 21-12-2016FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 DATED 21-12-2016
EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO ACIT/CC/KLM/ARR/17-18DATED 04-10-2017DATED 04-10-2017
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 33597 of 2017 (Y)------------------------------------------Dated: 23[rd] October, 2017
J U D G M E N T
Exts.P1 to P3 are the assessment orders passed
against the petitioner. Against the orders, thepetitioner filed Exts.P4 and P6 appeals before the 3[rd]respondent. The appeals are pending before the 3[rd]respondent. In the meanwhile, coercive proceedingshave been initiated. It is in this context, the writpetition has been filed.
2.Since it is submitted that, on the same subjectmatter, appeals were directed to be disposed of withinthree months, there shall be a similar direction in thiswrit petition also. The appellate authority, the 3[rd]respondent, shall dispose of the appeals within a periodof three months from the date of receipt of the certified
-2-
copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioner. The recovery proceedingsshall be kept in abeyance in the meanwhile.
The writ petition is disposed of without anyobservation on merits. No Costs.
Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
jjj 23/10/17
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.