Wp(C)/33670/2010 Of Vijayaprabha S v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/33670/2010 Of Vijayaprabha S v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/33670/2010 Of Vijayaprabha S v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Writ petition is dismissed. aks Sd/-(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) // True Copy // P.A.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932
WP(C).No. 33670 of 2010(G)
-------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------------
VIJAYAPRABHA S., D/O.SIVANANDAN R,
TEHEKKANAZHIKATHU VEEDU,THEKKEMURI,
EAST KALLADA PO, KOLLAM (PRESENTLY WORKING AS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM)
BY ADVS. SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN
SRI.C.K.PRASAD
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD,KOCHI PINCODE 682 018.
ADV.SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN, ASGI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No. 33670 of 2010 G```````````````````````````````````````````````````````Dated this the 9[th] day of November, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The issue raised in this writ petition is a servicematter. Petitioner will have to approach the CentralAdministrative Tribunal for relief sought for.
Writ petition is dismissed.
aks
Sd/-(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
// True Copy //
P.A. To Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue