Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/33731/2010 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v....

Wp(C)/33731/2010 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 26 Aug 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

26 Aug 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/33731/2010 Of K.p.abdul Majeed v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording thesubmission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/4TH BHADRA, 1936 WP(C).No. 33731 of 2010 (N) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER : --------------------- K.P.ABDUL MAJEED, "SONA", KOTTARAM ROAD, CALICUT. BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENTS : -------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 (1): CALICUT - 673 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT - 673 001. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.=====================W.P.(C) No. 33731 of 2010 - N ====================== Dated this the 26[th] day of August, 2014 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that theWrit Petition has become infructuous. Recording thesubmission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN,JUDGE SB // True Copy //P.A To Judge.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.