Wp(C)/34028/2009 Of T.s.sujatha v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
14 Dec 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/34028/2009 Of T.s.sujatha v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/34028/2009 Of T.s.sujatha v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931
WP(C).No. 34028 of 2009(W)
----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
T.S. SUJATHA, M.L. ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
BY ADV. MR.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA,
MR.TERRY V.JAMES,
MR.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH.
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM.
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE-1, KOTTAYAM.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14/12/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
rs.
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W.P.(C)No. 34028 of 2009- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 14[th] day of December, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Grievance voiced in this writ petition stands redressed,
since the learned standing counsel appearing for theIncome Tax Department had submitted that refund due tothe petitioner has already been allowed.
The above submission is recorded and the writ petitionis accordingly closed.
C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE
shg/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue