Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/34203/2005 Of A.p.venu v. Agrl.inc...

Wp(C)/34203/2005 Of A.p.venu v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer

High Court 08 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/34203/2005 Of A.p.venu v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/34203/2005 Of A.p.venu v. Agrl.income Tax & Sales Tax Officer, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2007 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 34203 of 2005(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ A.P.VENU, SASIVILAS, KAKKAVAYAL, MUTTI NORTH, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX OFFICER, VYTHIRI, KALPETTA. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), VYTHIRI. BY G.P. SRI.MOHAMMED RAFFIQ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.28.3.2005 ISSUED BY R1. P2: TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE U/S.7 OF THE RR ACT ISSUED BY R2 DT.31.8.05. P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE IN FORM NO.10 ISSUED BY R2 DT.31.8.2005. P4: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.58 DT.30.7.1986. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ....................................................................W.P.(C) No.34203 of 2005.................................................................... Dated this the 8th day of June, 2007. JUDGMENT It is seen that interest accrued on agricultural income tax dues only because of inordinate delay on the part of the respondents in raising thedemand. In a similar case this court vide judgment in W.P.(C)No.7238/2005 dated 8.11.2005 reduced the interest payable to 50% andgranted five instalments to the petitioner in that case to clear the arrears.Accordingly this W.P. is also disposed of following the above judgmentgranting three equal monthly instalments to clear the balance arrears if anydue after reckoning the payment already made pursuant to interim orderissued by this court on 8.12.2005 with 50% interest, first of which will bepaid on or before 30th of this month and the balance on or before the lastday of two succeeding months. If petitioner has paid full arrears of tax for1980-81 and 1981-82, the said amount will be excluded from the arrears.Recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance for payment as above and ifpetitioner commits default in payment of any instalment, the reduction ofinterest and instalment facility granted herein will stand cancelled and respondents will be free to proceed with recovery of entire amount with full interest. pms C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan