Wp(C)/34867/2016 Of The Manjoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
31 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/34867/2016 Of The Manjoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
31 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/34867/2016 Of The Manjoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under: i)The 1[st] respondent shall consider Ext.P2 appeal withina period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. ii)In the meantime, the demand made pursuant to Ext.P1assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/9TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 34867 of 2016 (G) ----------------------------
PETITIONER :
-----------------------
THE MANJOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.K73, MANJOOR, KOTTAYAM BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM. PIN-686 001.
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD(5), KOTTAYAM. PIN-686 001.
R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
--------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 10.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2013-14.
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 15.04.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-----------------------------------------
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * *
W.P.C.No.34867 of 2016
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of October 2016
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before the 1[st] respondent.It is submitted that during the pendency of the appeal, steps arebeing taken by the respondent authorities for recovering theamount demanded pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
2.Having regard to the fact that an appeal is pendingbefore the competent authority, I do not think it necessary toconsider the matter on merits. Suffice to say that the appellateauthority has to consider the appeal on merits within a specifiedtime and in the meantime, recovery can be kept in abeyance.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under:
i)The 1[st] respondent shall consider Ext.P2 appeal withina period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.
ii)In the meantime, the demand made pursuant to Ext.P1assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.