Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/35373/2018 Of Shri George Merlo Pa...

Wp(C)/35373/2018 Of Shri George Merlo Pallath v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/35373/2018 Of Shri George Merlo Pallath v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/35373/2018 Of Shri George Merlo Pallath v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY ,THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 8TH KARTHIKA, 1940WP(C).No. 35373 of 2018 PETITIONER/S: SHRI GEORGE MERLO PALLATH,AGED 57 YEARSPALLATH HOUSE, ALAPPAT CROSS ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM - 682 016. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSMT. ARYA ANILSMT. NILOOFAR O. NIZAMSRI.SREEJITH R.NAIR RESPONDENT/S: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE -2, RANGE-1, ERNAKULAM - 682 018. SC SRI. K.M.V. PANDALAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, an income tax assessee, filed the Ext.P2 applicationunder Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. Complaining that it has so farnot been disposed of, he has filed this writ petition. 2.In response to the submissions made by the petitioner'scounsel, the learned Standing Counsel informs the Court that therespondent will consider the petitioner's Ext.P2 application in twomonths. 3.Therefore, without adverting the merits, I dispose of the writpetition, holding that the respondent will consider the petitioner's Ext.P2application, expeditiously in two months. Till then the authorities will.defer all coercive steps Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RETURNS ALONG WITH COMPUTATION OF THE INCOME AND FORM NO.16A ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AND HIS MINOR SON. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 8.4.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 12.11.2013 ISSUED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2) KOCHI. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 20.11.2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), KOCHI. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 18.9.2018 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT NIL //True copy// PA to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan