Wp(C)/3547/2020 Of Smt.karippai Kochuvaried Molly v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
10 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3547/2020 Of Smt.karippai Kochuvaried Molly v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3547/2020 Of Smt.karippai Kochuvaried Molly v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 21ST MAGHA, 1941WP(C).No.3547 OF 2020(P)
PETITIONER:
SMT.KARIPPAI KOCHUVARIED MOLLYAGED 57 YEARSPATHADAN HOUSE, AWARD ROAD, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR-680307.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SMT.NISHA JOHNSRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERTHRISSUR-680001.
WARD 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR,
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYUAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001.
DR.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT.PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON10.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 10th day of February 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court, within less thantwelve working days, seeking a direction to the appellateauthority to dispose of the appeal and interim applicationpreferred against the assessment order issued by the secondrespondent - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
2.Though this Court ought not to have interfered, but inthe interest of justice, without expressing any opinion, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondentto take a decision on Ext.P3 application for stay filed along withExt.P2 appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
ACM/12.2.2020
SD/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED27.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR AY-2017-18 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICEAND COMPUTATION OF INCOME.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 25.01.2020 FOR AY-2017-18 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 25.01.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY-2017-18.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.