Wp(C)/35836/2017 Of V.p.abdul Kareem v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/35836/2017 Of V.p.abdul Kareem v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/35836/2017 Of V.p.abdul Kareem v. The Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the light of thesubmission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1940
WP(C).No. 35836 of 2017
PETITIONER(S)
V.P.ABDUL KAREEM
COURTYARD, PLOT NO.4,
CHERROOTTY NAGAR HOUSING COLONY,
PUTHIYARA POST, KOZHIKODE
BY ADVS.SRI.M.P.SHAMEEM AHAMED
SRI.CYRIAC TOM
SRI.S.K.SAJU
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2ND FLOOR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,
I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018.
2. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, AAYAAR BHAVAN,
MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001.
3. M/S GLOSOFT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
HOUSE OF G-TECH,
INDS AVENUE, CALICUT 67300.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH
R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
R3 BY ADV. SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN
R3 BY ADV. SRI.KURYAN THOMAS
R3 BY ADV. SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
R1 BY ADV. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-06-2018,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE COPIES OF TITLE DEEDS OF PROPERTY COVERED
UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 1012/2007
EXHIBIT P1A THE COPIES OF TITLE DEEDS OF PROPERTY COVERED
UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 605/2008
EXHIBIT P1B THE COPIES OF TITLE DEEDS OF PROPERTY COVERED UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 1013/2007 UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 1013/2007
EXHIBIT P1C THE COPIES OF TITLE DEEDS OF PROPERTY COVERED UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 120/2007 UNDER DOCUMENT NO. 120/2007
EXHIBIT P2 COPIES OF THE TAX RECEIPTS IN RESPECT OF THE ATTACHED PROPERTIES. ATTACHED PROPERTIES.
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE COMPANY LAW BOARD ORDER DATED 16.03.2011 16.03.2011
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE ATTACHMENT NOTICE DATED 19.12.2014
EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE SWORN STATEMENT DATED 4.02.2010
RECORDED FROM THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE
3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS DATED 17.09.2013 TO ATTACHMENT NOTICE DATED 07.08.2013DATED 07.08.2013
EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 04.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE
2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 12.11.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P9 COPY OF THE BOARD RESOLUTION DATED 20.03.2008.
EXHIBIT P10 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 27.11.2014
EXHIBIT P11 COPY OF LETTER DATED 5.12.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P12 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05.12.2014 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P13 COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 16.12.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P14 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.12.2014 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P15 COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P16 COPY OF THE NOTES OF ARGUMENTS ON 08.02.2016EXHIBIT P17 COPY OF CHARTERED ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE DATED 01.02.2016EXHIBIT P18 COPY OF THE BALANCE SHEET FOR THE YEAR 2008-09.EXHIBIT P19 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3.08.2017 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXHIBIT P20 COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED FILED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKODE.
EB
///TRUE COPY///P.A. TO JUDGE.
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No. 35836 of 2017
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of thesubmission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
EB
///TRUE COPY///P.A. TO JUDGE.
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No. 35836 of 2017
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of June, 2018
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of thesubmission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
EB
The 2[nd] sentence of the Judgment dated
12/06/2018 in W.P.(C) No. 35836/2017 is suo motucorrected and substituted as “In the light of thepermission sought by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn without prejudice to the right of thepetitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the samecause of action” as per order dated 26/06/2018 in W.P.(C) No. 35836/2017.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
MIN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.