Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/35867/2019 Of T.k.prasad v. The As...

Wp(C)/35867/2019 Of T.k.prasad v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Jan 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/35867/2019 Of T.k.prasad v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/35867/2019 Of T.k.prasad v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the abovesaidsubmission made on behalf of the petitioner, the above Writ Petition(Civil) will stand dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 16TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.35867 OF 2019(G) PETITIONER/S: T.K.PRASAD,AGED 51 YEARSS/O.KUTTAPPAN, THAMARASSERY HOUSE, MARATHAKKARA, OLLUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 320. BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM)SRI.SAJU.K.PERUTTY RESPONDENT/S: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR- 680 001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI.JOSE JOSEPH,, SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON06.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 35867 of 2019 ================== Dated this the 6[th] day of January, 2020 J U D G M E N T Sri.S.Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits on the basis of the instructions of his party that, in view of thesubsequent developments the matter has become infructuousinasmuch as the respondent has already passed orders in theimpugned proceedings and that the petitioner is taking steps to filestatutory appeal to challenge the said order. Recording the abovesaidsubmission made on behalf of the petitioner, the above Writ Petition(Civil) will stand dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- sdk+ ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan