Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/36167/2018 Of A.m. Abdul Razak v....

Wp(C)/36167/2018 Of A.m. Abdul Razak v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 18 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/36167/2018 Of A.m. Abdul Razak v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/36167/2018 Of A.m. Abdul Razak v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940 WP(C).No. 36167 of 2018 PETITIONER/S: A.M. ABDUL RAZAKHILL PRODUCE DEALER, VANDIPERIYAR, PEERMADE, IDUKKI-685 533. BY ADVS.SRI.S.EASWARANAUGUSTINE.M.A.SMT.SOUMYA JAMESSRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM)SRI.P.SREEKUMAR (THOTTAKKATTUKARA) RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-I, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 0012TAX RECOVERY OFFICEROFFICE OF THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001 BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SENIOR COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner confines his reliefs todischarge his entire liability as per Ext.P4demand notice issued by the 2[nd] respondent TaxRecovery Officer, Income Tax Office, Kottayamin installments. 2. Having considered the plea, thepetitioner is permitted to discharge hisentire liability in demand in 10 installmentsstarting from 28.03.2013, followed by everymonth. If the petitioner commits default inremitting any one of the installments as above, the respondent is free to proceed against the petitioner. Coercive steps asagainst the petitioner shall be deferred intune with the above directions. SB/19/03/2019 Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF NOTICE DATED 25.03.2015 ISSUED BYTHE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3COPY OF NOTICE DATED 18TH JANUVARY, 2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4COPY OF NOTICE OF DEMAND DATED 22.10.2018ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5COPY OF NOTICE DATED 15.10.2018 ISSUED BYTHE 1ST RESPONDENT.THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6COPY OF TAX PAYER COUNTER FOIL DATED 30.10.201830.10.2018 RESPONDENTS EXTS: NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan