Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/3650/2020 Of Edathadan Sukumaran U...

Wp(C)/3650/2020 Of Edathadan Sukumaran Udhavan v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 10 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3650/2020 Of Edathadan Sukumaran Udhavan v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3650/2020 Of Edathadan Sukumaran Udhavan v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal / Ext.P3 staypetition, in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months fro...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 21ST MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.3650 OF 2020(E) PETITIONER/S: SRI EDATHADAN SUKUMARAN UDHAVAN,AGED 40 YEARSS/O.SUKUMARAN, EDATHADAN HOUSE, ALOOR, V.R.PURAM P.O., CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR - 680 722. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)SMT.NISHA JOHNSRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001. OTHER PRESENT: SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON10.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to dispose of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition preferredbefore the second respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal / Ext.P3 staypetition, in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Till such time a decision is taken as aforesaid,recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessment order shallbe kept in abeyance. sab Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28/12/2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2017-18 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE &COMPUTATION OF INCOME. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 25/01/2020 FOR AY-2017-18 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 25/01/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY-2017-18.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan