W.p.(C)/3666/2015 Of Blb Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors
High Court
30 Jul 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/3666/2015 Of Blb Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors
Date of order
30 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In W.p.(C)/3666/2015 Of Blb Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$-14, 15 and 16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(C)3627/2015andCMNo.6473/2015
.. PetitionerBLB LIMITEDDUPUTYCOMMIsSeRofincometax&ORSRespondents
BLB LIMITED
+W.P.(C)3666/2015and CMNo.6526/2015
Petitioner
BLB LIMITED
DEPUTYCOMMISSIOOTROF INCOME-TAX&ORSRespondents
+W.P.(C)3782/2015
Petitioner
BLB LIMITED
COMMISSIONEROF INCOMETAX&deputy^Through;Mr S. Krishnanfor petitionerMrRohitMadanfor CIT
Respondents
HoS MR.JUSTICEBADARDURREZAHMEDHON BLEMR. JUSTICESANJEEVSACHDEVAORDER0/„30.07.2015
These writ petitions essentiallyseek directionswith regard to the reftmd
claims ofthe petitionersin respectof the assessment2006-07 to assessmentyears2011-12. Differentamountshave been claimedin each ofthe writ petitionsneed not intoas we areNo.1toofthe saidgospecifics directingrespondent disposeapplicationsfor refiindwithin four weeks from today. We are givingthe specificdirectionbecausethe learnedcounselfor the petitionerhas pointedout to us thatapplicationshave been pendingsince2012. We are not passingany orderson the for costs as we areNo. 1anto clear theSignature Not Verifiedprayers giving respondent opportunityDigitally SignedBy:AMULYAbacklogand to decidetheretadclaimsand grantthe consequentialrelief,itany,in
accordancewithlaw withinaperiodoffourweeks. Itis orderedaccordingly.
Thewritpetitionsstanddisposedof.
bSSaR DURREZAHMED,J
0A
JULY 30, 2015su
SANJEEVSACHDEVA,J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue