Wp(C)/3707/2004 Of Kalidas Choudhury v. Chief Comm. Of Income Tax And Ors
High Court
01 Apr 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · asghccis
Parties
Wp(C)/3707/2004 Of Kalidas Choudhury v. Chief Comm. Of Income Tax And Ors
Date of order
01 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3707/2004 Of Kalidas Choudhury v. Chief Comm. Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition is disposed of without prejudice to the remedy of thepetitioner to file appeal in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WP(C) 3707/2004B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.GOEL,THE CHIEF JUSTICETHE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.GOSWAMI
(A.K.Goel, CJ)
This petition has been preferred against order of the Assessing Officer under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 disallowing the deduction claimed by the petitioner-assessee.
Contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that order of the Assessing Officer dated 17.02.2004 is contrary to the order of the appellate authority i.e. DCIT(A) dated 20.04.1998.
Admittedly, against the order of the Assessing Officer a statutory remedy of appeal is available. There is no valid reason to entertain this petition, bypassing
the remedy of appeal. No doubt the writ petition has been pending for many years but since there is no handicap in the point sought to be raised in the writ petition being raised before the appellate authority itself, the petitioner is relegated to alternative remedy.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of without prejudice to the remedy of thepetitioner to file appeal in accordance with law. It is made clear that if appeal is filed within sixty days from today, the respondents will not raise plea oflimitation and the appeal may be decided on merits.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.