Wp(C)/3721/2020 Of Arayoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3721/2020 Of Arayoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
18 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3721/2020 Of Arayoor Service Co-Operative Bank v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 29TH MAGHA, 1941WP(C).No.3721 OF 2020(M)
PETITIONER/S:
1ARAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO 692,
ARAYOOR, NEYYATINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 122,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF ARAYOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 692,OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 692,
ARAYOOR, NEYYATINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 122,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.MOHANANSRI.C.P.SABARI
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERTRIVANDRUM-695 003.TRIVANDRUM-695 003.
WARD 2(2), AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX, KOWDIAR,
2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX, KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM-695 003.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX, KOWDIAR, TRIVANDRUM-695 003.
3THE BRANCH MANAGER,TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, UDAYAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 122.TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, UDAYAKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 122.
R3 BY SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SC THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. CO.OP BANKCO.OP BANK
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter is taken up, learned Counsel for the1[st] and 2[nd] respondents produced the order passed onrectification proceedings. Learned Counsel for the petitionersubmits that aforementioned order is not received by the client.However, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this writ petition. The writ petition isdismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to assail the order.
Jm/
Sd/
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.11.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 10.1.2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN APPEAL
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 1.1.2019 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 5.2.2020 ISSUED UNDER SEC 226(3)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.