Wp(C)/3725/2020 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3725/2020 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3725/2020 Of Avanankuzhi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.3725 OF 2020(M)
PETITIONER/S:
AVANANKUZHI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 2387,AVANANKUZHI, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.S.JAYASREE, W/O BIJU RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT VARUTHATTIL, MANGALATH KONAM, KATTACHALKUZHI P.O.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(2), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, RANGE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003.
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the secondrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P2.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the secondrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE RETURNS FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 29.6.2019
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.7.2019 ALONG WITH THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN EXHIBIT P3 APPEAL DATED, 7.2 .2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.