Wp(C)/3794/2020 Of Elappully Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
11 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3794/2020 Of Elappully Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
11 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3794/2020 Of Elappully Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.3794 OF 2020(Y)
PETITIONER/S:
ELAPPULLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,F 1193, ELAPPULLY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTAN NAGAR, THRISSUR,PIN - 680 001.2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 2, AAYKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD,PIN - 678 014.
OTHER PRESENT:
(SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of February 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the firstrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against theassessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the firstrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, the
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24/12/2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23/01/2019 FILEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2017-18.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE ORDER PROCEEDING DATED 06/02/2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.