Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/3802/2009 Of P.johny George v. Agr...

Wp(C)/3802/2009 Of P.johny George v. Agrl.income Tax & Cto

High Court 05 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3802/2009 Of P.johny George v. Agrl.income Tax & Cto
Date of order
05 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/3802/2009 Of P.johny George v. Agrl.income Tax & Cto, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3802 of 2009(C) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- P.JOHNY GEORGE, JOHNY POULTRY FARM, KANAKKANNUR, MANAPPADAM, PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SMT.K.HYMAVATHY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ALATHUR. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (AA), COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. by GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 3802 OF 2009 C -------------------------------------- Dated this the 5[th] February, 2009 JUDGMENT The prayer pressed before me is that the petitioner may bepermitted to pay off the entire amount due in six equal monthlyinstalments. Learned Government Pleader does not seriouslyoppose this prayer. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposedof permitting the petitioner to pay off the entire amount due withstatutory interest in six equal monthly instalments, the first ofwhich shall be payable on or before 1.3.2009 and the remaininginstalments on or before the first working day of everysucceeding month. If the petitioner does not pay any of theinstalments, he will lose the benefit of this Judgment and it willbe open to the respondents to enforce the assessment orders inaccordance with law. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan