Wp(C)/38785/2022 Of United Nurses Association v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/38785/2022 Of United Nurses Association v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/38785/2022 Of United Nurses Association v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 2 DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944WP(C) NO. 38785 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
UNITED NURSES ASSOCIATION2ND FLOOR, KORAPPATH LANECHEMBUKAVU P.OTHRISSUR, PIN – 680 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS SEYCRETARY- RASMI P.
BY ADV DIVYA RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2(1), AAYAKAR BHAVANINECOME TAX OFFICE&SHAKTHANTHAMBURA NAGARTHRISSUR, PIN – 680 001.
2THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTER, NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001.3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTER (NFAC),NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. JOSE JOSEPH (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON02.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of penalty for the assessmentyear 2018-2019 under the provision of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ithas preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 stay petition before the3[rd] respondent. The petitioner has been served with Ext.P4 noticeproposing to recover the amount due under Ext.P1 order imposingpenalty, pending consideration of the stay petition by the AppellateAuthority
2.Heard learned Standing Counsel also.3.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the caseconsidering the limited nature of the relief sought for by thepetitioner, the writ petition will stand disposed of by directing the 3[rd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition filedin Ext.P2 appeal as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy ofthis judgment. Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P3, furtherproceedings for recovery of any amount due under Ext.P1 shall bekept in abeyance.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- GOPINATH P.JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38785/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1THE TINE COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER ISSUED UNDERSECTION 270A OF THE ACT FOR AY 2018-19, BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.03.2022SECTION 270A OF THE ACT FOR AY 2018-19, BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.03.2022
Exhibit P2THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM IN FORM NO. 35 DATED 04.06.2022 FOR AY 2018-19 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENTNO. 35 DATED 04.06.2022 FOR AY 2018-19 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit P3THE TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORETHE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR AY 2018-19 DATED 02.6.2022THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR AY 2018-19 DATED 02.6.2022
Exhibit P4THE TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE DATED 21.10.2022, ISSUED BY THE LET RESPONDENT FOR AY 2018-19DATED 21.10.2022, ISSUED BY THE LET RESPONDENT FOR AY 2018-19
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.