Wp(C)/39079/2016 Of Baby K.k v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
08 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/39079/2016 Of Baby K.k v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/39079/2016 Of Baby K.k v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 39079 of 2016 (H)
-------------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S) :
---------------------------
BABY K.K., AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. KOCHUKURU, RESIDING AT KULAPPURATHU HOUSE, KADATHY KARA, VELOORKUNNAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.
BY ADVS. SMT.P.DEEPTHI SRI.SABU JOHN
RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD I ,OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN- 686 661.
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) II, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) II,PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 36.
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
-------------------------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
EXHIBIT P1:COPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT INCLUDING THE LAR NO. 35/1999DATED 10.02.2006 OF THE SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.DATED 10.02.2006 OF THE SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.
EXHIBIT P2:COPY OF THE DECREE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN LAA NO. 538/2006 DATED 11.12.2009.LAA NO. 538/2006 DATED 11.12.2009.
EXHIBIT P3:STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FROM 23.02.2012 TO 25.08.2012 FROM STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, MUVATTUPUZHA BRANCH.STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, MUVATTUPUZHA BRANCH.
EXHIBIT P3(A): CERTIFICATE TDS IN LAR 35/1999 DATED 28.12.2013.
EXHIBIT P4:COPY OF THE INCOME TAX RETURN FOR THE YEAR 2013-2014DATED 14.08.2013.DATED 14.08.2013.
EXHIBIT P5:COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO. AZEPK5454D/ITO/W-1/TDPA/15-16 DATED 21.08.2015 UNDER SECTION 142(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT./15-16 DATED 21.08.2015 UNDER SECTION 142(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT.
EXHIBIT P5(A): COPY OF THE NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 143(2) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. 143(2) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT.
EXHIBIT P5(B): COPY OF THE NOTICE TO THE PETITIONER NO. AZEPK5454D/ITO/W-1/TDPA/2015-16 UNDER SECTION 143(2) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. NO. AZEPK5454D/ITO/W-1/TDPA/2015-16 UNDER SECTION 143(2) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT.
EXHIBIT P6:COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER MADE BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-2014.THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-2014.
EXHIBIT P7:COPY OF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 271(1)(C) TO THE PETITIONER DATED 06.01.2016.THE PETITIONER DATED 06.01.2016.
EXHIBIT P8:COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER BEARING NO. 72/16 DATED 12.01.2016.BEARING NO. 72/16 DATED 12.01.2016.
EXHIBIT P9:COPY OF THE CIRCULAR BEARING F.NO. 24011/2009-LRD DATED 13.04.2011.DATED 13.04.2011.
EXHIBIT P10: COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT BEARING BA NO. 415/2010-2011DATED 16.05.2011.DATED 16.05.2011.
EXHIBIT P11: COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT BEARING NO. K.5283904PAID ON COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING DATED 08.01.2015.PAID ON COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING DATED 08.01.2015.
EXHIBIT P12: CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP ISSUED FOR THE PURCHASE OF GRANITE DATED 11.05.2013.GRANITE DATED 11.05.2013.
WP(C).No. 39079 of 2016 (H)
-------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P13: DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING NO. ITO/WARD/TDPA/ARR. DEMAND/2016-2017 DATED 22.08.2016.
EXHIBIT P14: COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL BEARING NO. CIT(A), KOCHI-2/10567/2015-2016.
EXHIBIT P14(A): COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH THE APPEAL BEARING NO. ITANO.II A/CIT(A)/W1/TPA/15-16.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
===============W.P. (C) No. 39079 of 2016
==================
Dated this, the 8[th] day of December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
EXHIBIT P12: CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP ISSUED FOR THE PURCHASE OF GRANITE DATED 11.05.2013.GRANITE DATED 11.05.2013.
WP(C).No. 39079 of 2016 (H)
-------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT P13: DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING NO. ITO/WARD/TDPA/ARR. DEMAND/2016-2017 DATED 22.08.2016.
EXHIBIT P14: COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL BEARING NO. CIT(A), KOCHI-2/10567/2015-2016.
EXHIBIT P14(A): COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED ALONG WITH THE APPEAL BEARING NO. ITANO.II A/CIT(A)/W1/TPA/15-16.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
===============W.P. (C) No. 39079 of 2016
==================
Dated this, the 8[th] day of December, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner has filed Ext.P14 appeal before the 2[nd] respondentand along with the appeal, petitioner has also filed an application forstay as Ext.P14(a). It is submitted that during the pendency of theappeal, steps are being taken by the respondent authorities forrecovering the amount in terms of Ext.P13 demand notice.
2. Having regard to the fact that an appeal is pending beforethe competent authority, I do not think it necessary to consider thematter on merits. Suffice to say that the appellate authority has toconsider the stay petition on merits within a specified time and in themeantime, the recovery can be kept in abeyance.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under:
(i)The 2[nd] respondent shall consider the stay petition filedalong with the appeal within a period of one month from the date ofreceipt of a copy of the judgment.
W.P(C) No.39079/16
-:2:-
(ii)Until such time, recovery proceedings shall be kept inabeyance.
Rp8/12/2016
Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.S to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.