Wp(C)/39218/2022 Of Abdul Jaleel Mankarathodi v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
08 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/39218/2022 Of Abdul Jaleel Mankarathodi v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/39218/2022 Of Abdul Jaleel Mankarathodi v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of thecase and considering the limited nature of relief sought for by thepetitioner, this writ petition will stand disposed of, directing the2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 applicationfor stay, in accordance with law, as expeditio...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 8 DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944WP(C) NO. 39218 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
ABDUL JALEEL MANKARATHODITHACHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MYLAPPURAM, DOWNHILL ERANADU TALUK, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676519
BY ADVS.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIRRAJATH R NATHHARIMA HARIHARANG.REMADEVI
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICEROFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), WARD- 3(2)(2), ROOM NO. 1625,16TH FLOOR, AIRINDIA BUILDING, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI, PIN - 4000212THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 1100013THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 2, TARIFF BAZAR, TOWN HALL ROAD, TIRUR, PIN - 676101
ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON08.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 39218 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment for theassessment year 2011-12 under the provisions of the Income TaxAct, 1961. Petitioner preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the 2[nd]respondent along with Ext.P3 application for stay. Pendingconsideration of the stay petition, petitioner has been served withExt.P4 intimation letter regarding recovery of amounts due underExt.P1. Petitioner prays that a direction may be issued to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 and till suchtime as orders are passed on Ext.P3, any proceedings for recoveryof amounts due under Ext.P1 may be kept in abeyance.
2.Heard the learned Standing Counsel also.
3.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of thecase and considering the limited nature of relief sought for by thepetitioner, this writ petition will stand disposed of, directing the2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 applicationfor stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, andat any rate, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till such time asorders are passed on Ext.P3, any proceedings for recovery of
WP(C) NO. 39218 OF 2022 3
amounts due under Ext.P1 order of assessment shall be kept inabeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
ajt
sd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 39218/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit.P1
Exhibit.P2
Exhibit.P3
Exhibit.P4
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24-12-2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12
COPY OF APPEAL MEMORANDUM DATED 16-01-2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXT.P1.COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 24-11-2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN EXT. P2 APPEAL
COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER DATED 22-11-2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.