Wp(C)/3936/2020 Of The Tripunithura Karshika Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/3936/2020 Of The Tripunithura Karshika Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/3936/2020 Of The Tripunithura Karshika Co-Operative Society Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 23RD MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.3936 OF 2020(N)
PETITIONER/S:
THE TRIPUNITHURA KARSHIKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTDNO. E 820, THEKKUMBHAGOM P.O., THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM - 682 301 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV. SRI.C.A.JOJO
RESPONDENT/S:
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking adirection to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before thesecond respondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment withoutinsisting on payment of 20% of the tax demanded, as percircular of 2017. Till such time a decision is taken on theappeal, recovery proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder shall be kept in abeyance.
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides,
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FORAY 2017-18 DATED 23.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE U/S 156 DATED 23.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3
A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR AY 2017-18 BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 21.01.2020
EXHIBIT P4
A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29.01.2020 FOR 20%OF TAX
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.