Wp(C)/39471/2022 Of Kelathparambil Ummer Muhammed Shareef v. The Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
13 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/39471/2022 Of Kelathparambil Ummer Muhammed Shareef v. The Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/39471/2022 Of Kelathparambil Ummer Muhammed Shareef v. The Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 13 DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 39471 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
KELATHPARAMBIL UMMER MUHAMMED SHAREEFAGED 36 YEARSSON OF KELATHPARAMBIL UMMER, KELATHPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARAKKAD, KONDURKKARA PO, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679303
BY ADVS.V.P.NARAYANANALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASSISTNAT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN - 6800012THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003ADV. JOSE JOSEPH, SC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON13.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment for the assessment year 2017-18 under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner preferred Ext.P2appeal before the 2nd respondent along with Ext.P3 application for stay. Petitionerapprehends that steps may be taken to recover amounts due under Ext.P1, pendingconsideration of Ext.P3 application for stay, by the appellate authority.
2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel also.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case andconsidering the limited nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, this writpetition will stand disposed of, directing the 2 nd respondent to consider and passorders on Ext.P3 application for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously aspossible, and at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt ofa certified copy of this judgment. Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P3, anydemand pursuant to Ext.P1 order of assessment shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
AMG
Sd/-GOPINATH P. JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 39471/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY2017-18 DATED 27.09.2022EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF MEMO OF APPEAL DATED 26.10.2022EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 25.10.2022
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR AY2017-18 DATED 27.09.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.