Wp(C)/39859/2022 Of Maheswari Textiles v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/39859/2022 Of Maheswari Textiles v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/39859/2022 Of Maheswari Textiles v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition will stand disposed of as above. sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE WP(C) NO.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 15 DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944WP(C) NO. 39859 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
MAHESWARI TEXTILESMAHESWARI BUILDING, MULLACKALALLEPPEY, KERALAREPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. NAGARAJA REDDIAR, PIN - 688011BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRTELMA RAJUEDATHARA VINEETA KRISHNANP.K.BIJUANJANA A.
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICERASSESSMENT UNITNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI, PIN - 1100012THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE NEW DELHI, PIN - 1100013INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1 & TPSALAPPUZHAKERALA, PIN - 688001
ADV. JOSE JOSEPH (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 39859 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment under theprovisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessmentyear 2017-18. Being aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment,petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before the National FacelessAppeal Centre (the 2[nd] respondent) . However, the petitionerhas not filed any stay application. The petitioner hasapproached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact thatpending consideration of the appeal by the National FacelessAppeal Centre, Ext.P3 demand notice has been issued to thepetitioner.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the respondentDepartment submits that, as per the instructions received byhim, the e-filing portal is now opened and the petitioner canvery well file a stay petition in Ext.P2 appeal. It is submittedthat if the petitioner is unable to upload a stay petition, thepetitioner can file a stay petition before the jurisdictionalAssessing Officer, who shall transfer the stay petition to theNational Faceless Appeal Centre, for determination.
3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that the petitioner will file a stay petition in the
ajt
manner suggested by the learned Standing Counsel and theproceedings for recovery of any amount due under Ext.P1 maybe kept in abeyance till a decision is taken on the stay petitionto be filed by the petitioner.
4.Having heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for therespondent Department, this writ petition will stand disposedof, directing that if the petitioner files a stay petition eitherbefore the National Faceless Appeal Centre through e-filingportal or before the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, anyproceedings for recovery of amounts under Ext.P1 order ofassessment shall be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken onthe stay petition to be filed by the petitioner. This benefit shallbe available to the petitioner only if the stay petition is filedwithin ten days from today.
The writ petition will stand disposed of as above.
sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 39859 OF 2022 4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 39859/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29-03-2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE A.Y. 2017-18.Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16-04-2022.Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 13.10.2022 FOR THE A.Y. 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE3RD RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.