Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/40083/2023 Of Vadakoot Gopalan Sur...

Wp(C)/40083/2023 Of Vadakoot Gopalan Suresh v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/40083/2023 Of Vadakoot Gopalan Suresh v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/40083/2023 Of Vadakoot Gopalan Suresh v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH THURSDAY, THE 30 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 40083 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: VADAKOOT GOPALAN SURESH AGED 41 YEARS S/O GOPALAN 66 ARYA S.N PARK, S.N PARK POOTHOLE POOTHHOLE, WEST FORT, THRISSUR., PIN - 680004 BY ADV DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA., PIN - 680001 CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA., PIN - 680001 2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA., PIN - 680001 CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD, THRISSUR, KERALA., PIN - 680001 3 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING IS PRESS ROAD, COCHIN KERALA., PIN – 682018 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING IS PRESS ROAD, COCHIN KERALA., PIN – 682018 BY NAVNEETH N NATH CGC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.40083/2023 -2- J U D G M E N T The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs: “1. To issue of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to refrain from recovering the demands pursuant to Exts P1 to P5 Orders, pending disposal of the appeals Exts P6 to P10, pending before the 3rd respondent for AY 2011-12 to 2015-16. 2. To stay all proceedings pursuant to Exts P1 to P5 Assessment Orders issued by the 1st respondent for the Years 2011-12 to 2015- 16, pending disposal of the appeals before the 3rd respondents; AND 3. To grant such other or further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The assessment order for the Assessment Year 2011-12 in respect of the petitioner was finalised under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act on 27.12.2017 in Ext.P1. In respect of the Assessment Years 2012- 13 to 2015-16 the petitioner declared the same income as W.P.(C) No.40083/2023 -3- originally declared in the return filed under Section 148 of the Act. The assessment orders in respect of these Assessment Years were also finalized on the same day, i.e., 27.12.2017. Aggrieved by the said Assessment Orders, the petitioner had filed appeals along with the application for staying the demand. The petitioner’s application for stay has been rejected as the petitioner had not remitted the 20% of tax demanded as per the relevant provision. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court, as this Court is sitting in parallel jurisdiction of the first Appellate Authority. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of the stay application, the remedy lies under the Income Tax Act and not before this Court. I find no ground to entertain this writ petition, which is hereby dismissed. jjj Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40083/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit - P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2011-12 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2011-12 Exhibit -P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2012-13 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2012-13 Exhibit - P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2013-14 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2013-14 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit - P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2011-12 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2011-12 Exhibit -P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2012-13 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2012-13 Exhibit - P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2013-14 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2013-14 Exhibit -P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2014-15 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2014-15 Exhibit -P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2015-16 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 147 OF THE ACT DATED 27.12.2017 FOR AY 2015-16 Exhibit- P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 FOR THE AY 2011-12 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2011-12 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit -P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 FOR THE AY 2012-13 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2012-13 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit- P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 FOR THE AY 2013-14 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2013-14 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit- P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 FOR THE AY 2014-15 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE FOR THE AY 2014-15 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit -P10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED IN FORM 35 FOR THE AY 2015-16 DATED 23.01.2018 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit -P11 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P (C ) NO. 7767/2018 DATED 8TH MARCH 2018 RENDERED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT Exhibit -P12 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 09.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT INTIMATING ABOUT THE OUTSTANDING DEMAND Exhibit -P13 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STAY ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ASKING THE PETITIONER TO PAY 20% OF THE OUTSTANDING DEMAND Exhibit -P14 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.11.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan