Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/4146/2007 Of K.k.subaida v. Agricu...

Wp(C)/4146/2007 Of K.k.subaida v. Agricultural Income Tax And Sales Tax Of

High Court 03 Aug 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

03 Aug 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/4146/2007 Of K.k.subaida v. Agricultural Income Tax And Sales Tax Of, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. tkv (P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge)

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 4146 of 2007(R) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: K.K.SUBAIDA, (FORMER PARTNER OF ARABIA JEWELLERY) PAREEDAS, CHETTAPPALAM, MANANTHAVADY. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & SALES TAX OFFICER, MANANTHAVADY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY. BY GOVT PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J.------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.4146 2007 R ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3[rd] day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter hasbecome infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. tkv (P.R.Ramachandra Menon, Judge)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.